IVP’s With Step Functions — Question 9

PDF ↗

Question 9

Let Ha(t)=0H_a(t)=0 for t<at<a and Ha(t)=1H_a(t)=1 for t≥at\ge a. Use one-sided Laplace transforms. Solutions are continuous (and have continuous first derivative for second-order equations); satisfy the equation away from switches and use one-sided derivatives there. Isolated input values do not change the solution.

Consider two qualitatively different input changes: y″+3y′+2y=H1(t)+(t−2)H2(t),y(0)=y′(0)=0.y''+3y'+2y=H_1(t)+(t-2)H_2(t),\qquad y(0)=y'(0)=0. One claim says that the jump at 11 makes yy jump; another says that because the ramp is continuous at 22, the solution must be smooth to every order there.

Tasks

  1. Find Y(s)Y(s) and invert it explicitly using the step and ramp responses.

  2. Verify the original IVP and determine the jumps in y,y′,y″,y‴y,y',y'',y''' at 11 and 22.

  3. Derive the leading small-τ\tau behavior of each newly activated response. Relate the orders of onset to the jump calculations.

  4. Evaluate both claims and explain whether a different assigned value of Ha(a)H_a(a) changes the response.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 4-7-009
Show solutionHide solution

Question 9 – Solution

Strategy. A second-order system smooths a step more than the input itself, but only by a finite number of derivatives. Check one-sided limits directly.

Step 1: Transform and invert. With zero data, Y=e−ss(s+1)(s+2)+e−2ss2(s+1)(s+2).Y=\frac{e^{-s}}{s(s+1)(s+2)} +\frac{e^{-2s}}{s^2(s+1)(s+2)}. Partial fractions give the two zero-start responses r(τ)=12−e−τ+12e−2τ,p(τ)=τ2−34+e−τ−14e−2τ,r(\tau)=\tfrac 12-e^{-\tau}+\tfrac 12e^{-2\tau},\qquad p(\tau)=\tfrac{\tau}2-\tfrac 34+e^{-\tau}-\tfrac 14e^{-2\tau}, so y=H1(t)r(t−1)+H2(t)p(t−2)\boxed{y=H_1(t)r(t-1)+H_2(t)p(t-2)}. Their transforms are the two unshifted rational factors displayed above.

Step 2: Verify the equation and all jumps. Direct differentiation gives r″+3r′+2r=1r''+3r'+2r=1 and p″+3p′+2p=τp''+3p'+2p=\tau. Moreover r(0)=r′(0)=p(0)=p′(0)=0r(0)=r'(0)=p(0)=p'(0)=0, verifying the initial data and C1C^1 matching. For the next derivatives, r″(0)=1,r‴(0)=−3,p″(0)=0,p‴(0)=1.r''(0)=1,\quad r'''(0)=-3,\qquad p''(0)=0,\quad p'''(0)=1. The previously active response is smooth at the next switch. Thus switch[y][y′][y″][y‴]1001−320001\begin{array}{c|rrrr} \text{switch}&[y]&[y']&[y'']&[y''']\\ \hline 1&0&0&1&-3\\ 2&0&0&0&1 \end{array} These are jumps of one-sided ordinary derivatives, not assigned values at the switch.

Step 3: Relate onset orders to regularity. Taylor expansion of the newly added responses gives r(τ)=12τ2−12τ3+O(τ4),p(τ)=16τ3+O(τ4),τ↓0.r(\tau)=\tfrac 12\tau^2-\tfrac 12\tau^3+O(\tau^4),\qquad p(\tau)=\tfrac 16\tau^3+O(\tau^4),\qquad \tau\downarrow 0. Joining the first to zero preserves one derivative but creates a second- derivative jump. Joining the second to zero preserves two derivatives but creates a third-derivative jump. These leading coefficients reproduce the jump sizes above.

Step 4: Resolve both claims and the convention. The first claim is false: yy and y′y' stay continuous at 11, while y″y'' jumps. The second is also false: yy is C2C^2 near 22 but not C3C^3 there. Changing an input at one isolated time does not change its Laplace integral or the solution obtained by continuous state matching. At switches the equation is interpreted through its one-sided limits, not by demanding an unavailable classical derivative. Away from them the solution is smooth. The growing linear tail gives exact real transform domain s>0s>0.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 4-7-009

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.