Solutions to Systems — Question 5

PDF ↗

Question 5

Consider X′=AX+f(t),A=(−100−2),f(t)=(1,2e−t)T.X'=AX+f(t),\quad A=\begin{pmatrix}-1&0\\0&-2\end{pmatrix},\qquad f(t)=(1,2e^{-t})^T. The proposed particular solution is P(t)=(1,2e−t)TP(t)=(1,2e^{-t})^T. Distinguish combinations of homogeneous solutions from combinations of solutions of this fixed nonhomogeneous system.

Tasks

  1. Verify PP, and prove that the full solution family is P+c1(e−t,0)T+c2(0,e−2t)TP+c_1(e^{-t},0)^T+c_2(0,e^{-2t})^T.

  2. If U,VU,V both solve the fixed forced system, determine exactly when αU+βV\alpha U+\beta V also solves it. Prove the condition for real constants α,β\alpha,\beta.

  3. Solve the IVP X(0)=(0,0)TX(0)=(0,0)^T and check its initial derivative against the original right-hand side.

  4. For t≥0t\ge 0, find the maximum of the second component of this IVP and its time. Find the limiting state and decide whether that limiting vector, held constant, is itself a solution of the forced system.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 5-5-005
Show solutionHide solution

Question 5 – Solution

Strategy. Subtract one particular solution to expose the homogeneous family; keep the forcing when testing superposition.

Step 1: Verify and complete the affine family. Here P′=(0,−2e−t)T=AP+fP'=(0,-2e^{-t})^T=AP+f. For any other solution XX, the difference H=X−PH=X-P satisfies H′=AHH'=AH, so H=(c1e−t,c2e−2t)TH=(c_1e^{-t},c_2e^{-2t})^T. Conversely each such sum solves the forced equation. Thus the proposed family is complete.

Step 2: Test a weighted combination. For Z=αU+βVZ=\alpha U+\beta V, Z′−AZ=(α+β)f(t).Z'-AZ=(\alpha+\beta)f(t). Because the first component of ff is always 11, equality to ff holds exactly when α+β=1\boxed{\alpha+\beta=1}. In particular an average is a solution, while a sum generally is not. The difference of two forced solutions solves the homogeneous equation.

Step 3: Impose the zero initial state. The constants are c1=−1c_1=-1, c2=−2c_2=-2, yielding X(t)=(1−e−t,2e−t−2e−2t)T.\boxed{X(t)=(1-e^{-t},\,2e^{-t}-2e^{-2t})^T.} At 00 this is zero, but X′(0)=(1,2)T=f(0)X'(0)=(1,2)^T=f(0). A zero initial state therefore does not imply a zero solution in this nonhomogeneous problem.

Step 4: Locate the peak and interpret the limit. For y=2e−t(1−e−t)y=2e^{-t}(1-e^{-t}), y′=2e−t(2e−t−1)y'=2e^{-t}(2e^{-t}-1). It is positive before ln⁡2\ln 2 and negative after, so the unique maximum on t≥0t\ge 0 is y(ln⁡2)=1/2\boxed{y(\ln 2)=1/2}. The state tends to (1,0)T(1,0)^T. However the constant vector (1,0)T(1,0)^T has zero derivative while A(1,0)T+f(t)=(0,2e−t)T≠0A(1,0)^T+f(t)=(0,2e^{-t})^T\ne 0 at finite times. A limiting state need not itself be a constant solution of a time-dependent forced equation. The plot marks the actual second-component peak.

See the diagram in the original worksheet below.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 5-5-005

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.