Modeling with First Order DE’s — Question 6

PDF ↗

Question 6

An inverted conical tank has height 44 m and top radius 22 m. It initially contains water to the brim. Let h(t)h(t) be water depth above the outlet, with tt in seconds. Assume horizontal water surfaces and similar conical cross-sections. The outflow rate is prescribed by Q(h)=κh,κ=0.05 m5/2/s,Q(h)=\kappa\sqrt h,\qquad \kappa=0.05\text{ m}^{5/2}/\text{s}, while h>0h>0. There is no inflow. Ignore changes in the discharge coefficient and stop outflow once the tank is empty.

Tasks

  1. Derive the volume as a function of depth and use volume conservation to form an IVP for hh.

  2. Solve for the depth until emptying and find the emptying time.

  3. Find the fractions of the emptying time needed to reach half the original depth and half the original volume. Explain why these are different.

  4. Sketch the physical depth, including the empty state. Decide whether depth and volume have continuously differentiable extensions through emptying, and explain the scope of the divided depth equation.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 2-7-006
Show solutionHide solution

Question 6 – Solution

Strategy. The water surface area changes with depth. Convert a volume-loss law into a depth equation before separating variables.

Step 1: Use the conical geometry. Similarity gives r=h/2r=h/2, so V=πh3/12V=\pi h^3/12 and πh24h′=−0.05h,h′=−0.20πh−3/2,h(0)=4.\frac{\pi h^2}{4}h'=-0.05\sqrt h,\qquad h'=-\frac{0.20}{\pi}h^{-3/2},\qquad h(0)=4. The first equality has units m3^3/s. Division by h2h^2 is valid only while water remains.

Step 2: Integrate to emptying. Integrating h3/2dh=−(0.20/π)dth^{3/2}\,dh=-(0.20/\pi)\,dt gives h5/2=32−t/(2π)h^{5/2}=32-t/(2\pi), hence h(t)=(32−t/(2π))2/5,0≤t<te,te=64π≈201.06 s.\boxed{h(t)=(32-t/(2\pi))^{2/5}},\qquad 0\le t<t_e,\qquad \boxed{t_e=64\pi\approx 201.06\text{ s}}. Equivalently, h=4(1−t/te)2/5h=4(1-t/t_e)^{2/5}. Differentiation verifies the depth equation; the physical depth is set to zero for t≥tet\ge t_e.

Step 3: Compare depth and volume targets. At h=2h=2 m, h/4=1/2h/4=1/2, giving th/te=1−2−5/2≈0.8232.\boxed{t_h/t_e=1-2^{-5/2}\approx 0.8232}. At half volume, (h/4)3=1/2(h/4)^3=1/2, so tV/te=1−2−5/6≈0.4388.\boxed{t_V/t_e=1-2^{-5/6}\approx 0.4388}. Half depth leaves only one eighth of the original volume, so it takes substantially longer than losing half the volume.

See the diagram in the original worksheet below.

Step 4: Interpret the endpoint. As t↑tet\uparrow t_e, h′→−∞h'\to-\infty, so the zero continuation of depth is continuous but not differentiable at emptying. However, V′=−0.05h→0V'=-0.05\sqrt h\to 0, agreeing with V′=0V'=0 afterward; volume has a continuously differentiable zero continuation. The divided depth equation is a wet-tank model and is undefined at h=0h=0. It must not be continued algebraically into a fictitious refilling branch.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 2-7-006

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.