Equilibrium Solutions — Question 10

PDF ↗

Question 10

Compare two autonomous equations on the real line: A: y′=−y,B: y′=−y1+y2.\text{A: }y'=-y,\qquad \text{B: }y'=-\frac{y}{1+y^2}. For the quantitative comparison, use the same initial value y(0)=a>0y(0)=a>0.

Tasks

  1. Compare the equilibrium sets, phase-line arrows and derivatives of the right-hand sides at the equilibria. Prove the stability classification for both equations.

  2. Find the solution of A and an implicit relation for B. Justify global forward existence and convergence for B.

  3. Derive the time required to decrease from aa to a/2a/2 for each equation. Explain how the difference depends on aa.

  4. For a=2a=2, sketch both trajectories and determine which is larger for every t>0t>0. Explain what identical equilibrium and local derivative data fail to specify.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 2-8-010
Show solutionHide solution

Question 10 – Solution

Strategy. Multiplication by a positive state-dependent factor preserves the direction of motion, but changes the time spent along the same phase-line path.

Step 1: Compare equilibrium information. Both equations have only the equilibrium 00, with positive velocity below zero and negative velocity above. Both right-hand-side derivatives at zero equal −1-1. In each model, a solution is trapped between its initial value and zero, which proves stability. Smoothness, boundedness and monotonicity give global forward existence and convergence to the only accessible zero. Thus both equilibria are globally asymptotically stable.

Step 2: Solve the selected branches. For A, yA=ae−t\boxed{y_A=ae^{-t}}. For B with y>0y>0, separation gives dt=−(1/y+y)dy,t=ln⁡(a/y)+a2−y22.dt=-(1/y+y)dy,\qquad \boxed{t=\ln(a/y)+\frac{a^2-y^2}{2}}. The right side decreases strictly with yy on (0,a](0,a], is zero at aa, and tends to infinity as y↓0y\downarrow 0. It therefore defines a unique positive solution for every t≥0t\ge 0. Implicit differentiation recovers B and confirms that zero is approached only in infinite time.

Step 3: Compare halving times. Setting y=a/2y=a/2 yields TA=ln⁡2,TB=ln⁡2+3a28.\boxed{T_A=\ln 2,\qquad T_B=\ln 2+\frac{3a^2}{8}}. The extra time in B grows quadratically with the initial amplitude. It tends to zero as a↓0a\downarrow 0, consistent with the identical local derivatives, but can be arbitrarily large for large aa.

See the diagram in the original worksheet below.

Step 4: Order the trajectories. For t>0t>0, the B solution satisfies 0<yB<a0<y_B<a, so its implicit equation gives t>ln⁡(a/yB)t>\ln(a/y_B). Hence yB>ae−t=yA\boxed{y_B>ae^{-t}=y_A}. The graph uses a=2a=2, for which TB=ln⁡2+3/2T_B=\ln 2+3/2.

The factor 1/(1+y2)1/(1+y^2) is positive and equals 11 at zero, preserving phase directions and the local linear rate. Away from zero it slows the motion. Equilibria and local stability data alone do not specify finite-amplitude travel times or entire solution curves.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 2-8-010

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.