Review : Matrices & Vectors — Question 3

PDF ↗

Question 3

Work with real matrices and column vectors. Write InI_n for the n×nn\times n identity, ATA^T for transpose, and ∥v∥=vTv\|v\|=\sqrt{v^Tv} for Euclidean length. Show the reasoning behind every classification; do not use eigenvalue methods.

Let Aτ=(1111τ111τ),b=(123),τ∈ℝ.A_\tau=\begin{pmatrix}1&1&1\\1&\tau&1\\1&1&\tau\end{pmatrix}, \qquad b=\begin{pmatrix}1\\2\\3\end{pmatrix},\qquad \tau\in\mathbb R.

Tasks

  1. Find det⁡Aτ\det A_\tau by determinant-preserving row operations and classify invertibility.

  2. For the invertible cases, derive Aτ−1A_\tau^{-1} by solving Aτx=cA_\tau x=c for a general column cc. Verify the formula.

  3. Solve Aτx=bA_\tau x=b for every τ\tau. At the singular parameter, classify consistency for an arbitrary right-hand side cc.

  4. Compare the behavior near τ=1\tau=1 for right-hand sides (1,2,3)T(1,2,3)^T and (1,1,1)T(1,1,1)^T. Explain why invertibility for each nearby parameter does not imply a uniform bound on recovered vectors.

Original worksheet page 1: question and worked solution for 5-2-003
Show solutionHide solution

Question 3 – Solution

Strategy. Subtracting the first row exposes the parameter that controls both inversion and the exceptional case.

Step 1: Compute the determinant. Replace rows two and three by themselves minus row one. These operations do not change the determinant and produce (1110τ−1000τ−1).\begin{pmatrix}1&1&1\\0&\tau-1&0\\0&0&\tau-1\end{pmatrix}. Therefore det⁡Aτ=(τ−1)2\boxed{\det A_\tau=(\tau-1)^2}, and inversion is possible exactly when τ≠1\tau\ne 1.

Step 2: Solve for a general right-hand side. Put d=τ−1≠0d=\tau-1\ne 0. The subtracted equations give x2=(c2−c1)/dx_2=(c_2-c_1)/d, x3=(c3−c1)/dx_3=(c_3-c_1)/d, and x1=c1−x2−x3x_1=c_1-x_2-x_3. Thus Aτ−1=(1+2/d−1/d−1/d−1/d1/d0−1/d01/d).\boxed{A_\tau^{-1}=\begin{pmatrix} 1+2/d&-1/d&-1/d\\-1/d&1/d&0\\-1/d&0&1/d \end{pmatrix}.} Substitution in the three original equations returns c1,c2,c3c_1,c_2,c_3 for every cc, so multiplication AτAτ−1=I3A_\tau A_\tau^{-1}=I_3 is verified. The displayed matrices are symmetric, and transposing that equality also verifies multiplication in the opposite order.

Step 3: Handle the prescribed and singular systems. For τ≠1\tau\ne 1, x=(1−3d,1d,2d)T.\boxed{x=\left(1-\frac 3d,\frac 1d,\frac 2d\right)^T.} At τ=1\tau=1, all three left sides are x1+x2+x3x_1+x_2+x_3, while the entries of bb differ, so there is no solution. For a general cc, consistency at 11 is equivalent to c1=c2=c3c_1=c_2=c_3. If they coincide, the whole plane x1+x2+x3=c1x_1+x_2+x_3=c_1 is the solution set; otherwise it is empty.

Step 4: Distinguish invertibility from bounded recovery. For b=(1,2,3)Tb=(1,2,3)^T, the coordinate x2=1/(τ−1)x_2=1/(\tau-1) becomes unbounded near 11. For c=(1,1,1)Tc=(1,1,1)^T, the unique nearby solution is always (1,0,0)T(1,0,0)^T. Thus some data remain harmless while other fixed data yield arbitrarily large solutions. The factors 1/d1/d in the inverse prevent a uniform bound near the singular parameter, even though every matrix with d≠0d\ne 0 is invertible.

Original worksheet page 2: question and worked solution for 5-2-003

Original worksheet layout. Use Enlarge or open the PDF for a closer view.